Connect with us

CHANGE ON THE GROUND

A 500-Year-Old Civilisational Wound Gets An Assured Healing

The SC has ruled that the Sunni Waqf Board HAS FAILED to establish its case. Muslims should be given alternate land for building a mosque.

Published

on

NEW DELHI: In a unanimous verdict, a five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and comprising Chief Justice-designate Justice SA Bobde, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice SA Nazeer, has ruled that the Sunni Waqf Board HAS FAILED to establish its case on the land (Shri Ram Janmabhoomi). Muslims should be given alternate land for building the ‘lost Mosque’.

Also Read: Story About The Hearing In SC And Links To Other Related Stories Inside

The bench has ruled that the Union Government should formulate a scheme within 3-4 months for setting up of trust and hand over the disputed site to it for construction of a temple at the site. At the same time, a suitable alternative plot of land measuring 5 acres at Ayodhya will be given to Sunni Wakf Board.


In pointers:

  • A suitable plot of land measuring 5 acre shall be given to Sunni Waqf Board either by the state or by the Centre
  • Under Article 142, SC directs in the scheme to be framed, Nirmohi Akhara to also get representation
  • Land to remain vested in statutory receiver till trust is formed
  • Trust to be formed in three months
  • Management of construction of the temple to be monitored by the trust
  • Suit 3 by Nirmohi Akhara dismissed as barred by limitation.
  • Suit 4 and suit 5 within limitation.
  • Central Govt should within 3 months formulate a scheme envisaging setting up of Trust
  • Possession of inner and outer courtyards to be handed over to the Trust

The entire judgement would be placed on the official website of the Supreme Court of India here:
https://www.sci.gov.in/pdf/judgment.pdf

Dismissing the claim of the Sunni side that the report by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) was based on conjectures, the bench ruled there is adequate material in ASI report to conclude the following:



Babri Masjid (built in the 15th Century) NOT constructed on vacant land.

There was a structure underlying the disputed structure.

The underlying structure belonged to the 12th Century.

The underlying structure was NOT an Islamic structure.

On the subject of the ASI scientific report, hough the ASI had refrained from recording a finding on whether the mosque was built after demolishing a Hindu temple, “the finding of title cannot be based only on the expert report of ASI”, the Supreme Court said. “Title to the land should be decided based on settled legal principles,” the 5-judge bench held.


HIGHLIGHTS OF THE JUDGEMENT:

Hindus believe that Lord Ram was born right below the central dome of the disputed structure, SC

Both Hindu and Muslim witnesses indicate that Hindus and Muslims were offering prayers at the disputed site

Whether a belief is justified is beyond judicial inquiry. Once faith is established, courts should defer to it


A title should be decided based on evidence in a court of law. A title cannot be established based on faith and belief

Suit 4 of Sunni Board is a suit for possession and is covered by Article 142 of Limitation Act.

So the limitation is 12 years and Suit 4 is within the limitation

Possession, as asserted by Muslims, cannot meet the threshold of adverse possession

From documentary evidence, it emerges that prior to 1857, there was no exclusion of Hindus from worshipping at the site

The outer courtyard became a focal point of worshipping by Hindus

Riots of 1934 indicate that the possession of inner courtyard became a matter of serious contention

Muslims have not been able to establish possessory title to the inner courtyard

The Muslims have not brought evidence to show possessory title, there is no evidence to show the offer of Namaz by Muslims to the exclusion of Hindus.


Hindus have been able to establish unimpeded possession of outer courtyard

The disputed site is one composite plot

The inner courtyard is a contested site. Evidence indicates no abandonment of mosque by Muslims

Destruction of mosque against the rule of law


The first pronouncement was in the form of the bench dismissing the claim of the Shia Waqf Board with regards the ownership of the site. (The main party, it may be noted, is the Sunni Waqf Board)

Next reading by the bench was that Suit 3 filed by Nirmohi Akhara is governed by Article 120 of Limitation Act and is barred by limitation. The claim of Nirmohi Akhara is only of management. Nirmohi Akhara is not a Shabait, ruled Supreme Court.

The bench had reserved the judgement on October 16, after 40 days of daily hearing on the matter, which began on August 6.

An old lady praying at Ram temple at Tulsibaug, Pune, Maharashtra. (File Photo: Siddhartha Joshi)

While there has been an unmanageable frenzy in media and social media, the situation on the ground at the moment seems to be almost exactly opposite of that:

In equal measure, #hindumuslimbhaibhai started trending as one of the top India trends on Twitter with at least 10,000 tweets till 10 am. Authorities said social media posts will be monitored to ensure that no attempt is made to vitiate the atmosphere by spreading fake or inflammatory content. Arrangements have also been made to ensure the safety and security of religious places across the country.

Ground Situation Update (22:00 HRS / 10 PM):


IN BRIEF

What is the Case:

Ostensibly a plot of land of 2.77 acres in Ayodhya. For more than seven decades, Hindu campaigners have been pushing to build a temple there for Bhagwan Shri Ram, who they believe was born on the site where the Mughals later built the Babri mosque — upon an existing temple.

The Allahabad High Court in 2010 ordered the disputed land be split into three parts, two going to Hindu groups and the third to the Sunni Waqf Board, representing Muslims. All three parties appealed to the Supreme Court. (Meanwhile, a fourth group that says it represents Shias joined the case, asking for the land to go to the Hindus.) Final hearings began in August and ended October 16.

What are the Claims of the Litigants:

To Hindus, it’s the revered birthplace of Bhagwan Shri Ram. To Muslims, it’s the site of a 16th-century mosque that was razed in 1992 by kar sevaks (volunteers). After a long legal fight, the Supreme Court today ruled on which of the country’s two biggest religions owns the site.

What is the Brief History of the Issue:

During British rule, the colonial masters kept the site divided, permitting Muslims to pray inside the mosque and Hindus to worship outside. In 1949, Hindu activists forcefully entered the mosque and placed an idol of Ram inside.

Anticipating violence, the Jawahar Lal Nehru government locked the main gate. Lawsuits were then filed by religious groups seeking control. The issue stayed in limbo till the 1980s, when many Hindu organisations and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) launched a campaign to build a Bhagwan Shri Ram temple at the site.

On December 6, 1992, a frenzied Hindu mob gathered and razed to the ground much of the mosque. That provoked nationwide riots in which more than 2,000 people lost their lives.

On March 12, 1993, more than 250 people were killed in retaliatory bombings in Mumbai.


The Reason Behind Choosing Today’s Date for Judgement:

Justice Ranjan Gogoi is due to retire on November 17. November 17 is a Sunday and usually, the verdict in an important case is not announced on a holiday. The court’s decisions are also not announced on a day a judge retires. Moreover, the last working day of Justice Gogoi is November 15.

In terms of normal practice, if the court announces a verdict, the next day, the plaintiff or one of the defendants requests the court to review the decision again, and the process generally takes one or two days.

Hence Justice Gogoi might have decided to go for the judgement today.

Security Establishment On Top Of The Moment:

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has also dispatched around 4,000 paramilitary personnel for security deployment in Uttar Pradesh, particularly in Ayodhya.

A general advisory has been sent to all states and Union territories asking them to deploy adequate security personnel in all sensitive places and ensure that no untoward incident takes place anywhere in the country.

Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP) Om Prakash Singh notified that several confidence-building measures have been taken by the cops. “We did around 10,000 meetings across the state with religious leaders and citizens. We are appealing to  the people of the state to not spread rumours on social media.”

Paramilitary forces have been deployed in Ayodhya and drones are being used to conduct aerial surveillance on the day of the Ayodhya case verdict. Singh added that the intelligence machinery has also been geared up and random checks are also taking place. An ADG rank officer has been deployed in Ayodhya to keep an eye on operations, Singh said.

As an exercise of utmost caution, the Uttar Pradesh-Nepal border has been sealed following a meeting of top officials with Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath around Friday midnight. Additional Chief Secretary for Home Avanish Awasthi said that no one without proper identification would be allowed to move along the sensitive border. Awasthi said that railway forces have been directed to take safety and security of railway passengers inside trains and railway stations.

On Friday, hours before the Supreme Court notified the Saturday sitting, Gogoi met Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary Rajendra Kumar Tiwari and Director General of Police Om Prakash Singh in his court chamber.

Continue Reading
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Sanjana

    9th November 2019 at 12:46 PM

    Very informative article. Gives a clear picture of the whole situation. A good read.

  2. Kiran Baliyan

    9th November 2019 at 1:25 PM

    Thanks for such detailed and balanced article on one of the most discussed and awaited judgement on a very disputed issue. Glad that it was a very balanced, mature and unanimous judgement by the SC. It should add to harmony among all sections of society. On the same day, another historical event is opening of Kartarpur corridor to Dera Baba Nanak gurudev.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

CHANGE ON THE GROUND

HISTORIC: 644 Terrorists From 8 Terror Groups Surrender With Arms In Assam

The terrorists have deposited 177 arms, huge ammunition and other explosive materials.

Published

on

GUWAHATI (Assam): 644 militants from 8 outfits on Thursday laid down their arms in Guwahati, Assam before Chief Minister Sarbanand Sonowal and senior officials.

Among those who surrendered include 50 terrorists from ULFA (Independence), 8 of National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB), 178 from Adivashi Dragon Fighter (ADF).

The terrorists have deposited 177 arms, huge ammunition and other explosive materials.

Welcoming the militants to the mainstream, Chief Minister Sonowal appealed them to contribute in the nation-building process. He said that laying down of arms would further boost the peace process in the state.


Terming it as one of the largest instances of the terrorist surrender in Assam, Director General of Police (DGP) Bhaskar Jyoti Mahanta said January 23 would henceforth be marked as a special day.

Mahanta said this will impact the peace process favourably. He hoped that more boys in different extremist groups would come forward to join this peace process.

Continue Reading

CHANGE ON THE GROUND

IRCTC To Pay Compensation Of Rs 100 Each To 630 Passengers Of Tejas Express

The Tejas Express and a few other suburban and outstation trains were held up due to a technical problem on the outskirts of Mumbai.

Published

on

MUMBAI (Maharashtra): Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) has said that it will pay a compensation of 100 rupees each to around 630 passengers of the Ahmedabad-Mumbai Tejas Express because of a delay.

The Express, the second IRCTC-run train which commenced commercial operations from January 19, was delayed for over an hour on Wednesday afternoon as it was entering Mumbai. The train reached the Mumbai Central station around 1 hour and 30 minutes late.

The IRCTC spokesperson said the passengers will have to apply as per the refund policy. They will be given a refund after verification.


According to railway officials, the premium train departed from Ahmedabad at 6.42 am, two minutes late. But it arrived at Mumbai Central at 2.36 pm instead of the scheduled time of 1.10 pm.

The Tejas Express and a few other suburban and outstation trains were held up due to a technical problem on the outskirts of Mumbai.

The IRCTC spokesperson said that as the train was delayed, around 630 passengers who travelled up to Mumbai Central will be given compensation.



Continue Reading

AGENTS OF CHANGE

‘Orange Cafe’ By Acid Attack Survivors To Open In Varanasi On January 29

After the Sheroes Hangout Cafe in Lucknow and Agra, acid attack survivors in Varanasi will soon have a cafe that will be run by them.

Published

on

BANARAS/KASHI (Uttar Pradesh): After the Sheroes Hangout Cafe in Lucknow and Agra, a new cafe, owned and managed by acid attack survivors, is set to be inaugurated in Banaras/Kashi on Basant Panchami (January 29)—a day which marks the advent of spring in north India.

The cafe is named The Orange — with reference to UNESCO’s ‘Orange the World’ Campaign which sets aside 16 days starting from November 25 every year to galvanise action against all forms of violence against women.

The man behind the project is Ajay Kumar Patel, who started the ‘Red Brigade’ in 2011 which is an NGO that trains women in self-defence.


Patel said: “We are starting The Orange Cafe from a rented place but we soon plan to get ownership of the place. Our aim is to make sure that the acid attack survivors own the café and run it themselves.”

‘The Orange’ was initially planned to be situated at the iconic and divine Assi Ghat—one of the city’s most popular tourist destinations—but the property rates there proved to be too prohibitive. Eventually, the selected sited is now at Varanasi’s Durga Kund area in a 600 square feet space.

Patel has been travelling through the state since the past two years to connect with acid attack survivors in various districts.



He short-listed four survivors, who were willing to shift to Varanasi and take on the responsibility of running the cafe.

So far, Patel has short-listed 4 candidates to run the café, namely, Rekha Devi (35) (acid attack during a loot attempt in 2015) from Jaunpur, Somvati (18) (acid attack following a village dispute in 2015) from Bareilly, Vimla Passi (39) (acid attack followeing rape in 2008) from Rae Bareli and Badam Devi (35) (acid attack over a property dispute in 2012) from Varanasi.

We are now training these women to cook food, serve the customers and undertake the billing. We do not want them to depend on others for these tasks. For the first four months, we will pay them a token amount but they will later share the profit among themselves,” said Patel.

Somvati from Bareilly, who is hopeful of a better life in this new venture, adds, “I want to ensure good education for my 10-year-old son and the cafe will help me fulfil my dream’’.

Somvati was attacked with acid by her neighbour three years ago when she spurned his advances.

The decor, with hints of orange and red to mark the struggles of women, has been conceptualised by the Visual Arts Department of the Banares Hindu University. “We wanted everything to be hand-painted, but time constraints have made us use flex as well”, said Patel.


Continue Reading

Most Read This Month

error: Content on this news portal is protected!